Originally posted by Wheatfield Nope. I’ve learned to crop my images to fit the final purpose.
Also, you are wrong about a 4:3 or 5:4 sensor providing higher usable resolution.
That's the whole point of what I said. Anymore people posting things like "Just crop it" missed my point entirely. I do "Just crop it" almost all the time, and as such its a waste of sensor real-estate.
And no, you are wrong. A 4:3 sensor ratio is by definition taller, and thus has a higher linear resolution than a cropped 3:2. I don't know what you're thinking there.
If I recall one, of the reasons we even have the 645 ratio is because prolific shooters like Ansel Adams kept cropping their 6x6 negatives, so someone had the bright idea to just make a camera that stopped wasting that valuable film space.
---------- Post added 02-07-19 at 01:50 PM ----------
Also as the Full Frame market becomes more crowded, manufactures are going to have to differentiate themselves from the competition to survive. A 5:4 sensor would be appealing to many photographers.
Last edited by Leumas; 02-07-2019 at 12:54 PM.