Originally posted by bigdavephoto This thread is also bringing up another subject that nobody has said yet, and could be why Ricoh will not sell parts directly and the repair centers are not allowed too.
That's called right to repair.
A lot of companies are fighting and trying to stop congress from passing right to repair laws. Apple is one of the biggest ones that is fighting. If you would like to see what Apple is doing, look up Louis Rossmann on youtube.
If you don't know what right to repair is, in a nutshell, the law states that when a person buys an item (cell phone, camera, car, tractor, ect) the person has the right to obtain parts, diagrams, and whomever the person decides to repair the said item. If item is under warranty, then you send it to authorized repair centers. Where the right to repair comes in is when an item is out of warranty. If you have a cell phone with a broken screen, you should be able to take it to anybody that can fix broken screens. That person should also be able to get the parts to repair the broken screen easily.
This is why Ricoh should be looking carefully at how they are selling parts.
I'm always wary when I see the word "right" or "rights", as discussions can veer towards politics - or, laws that are governed politically. So, let's stick to the commercial aspect.
We're going a bit off-topic here, but...
"Right to repair" is a nice theoretical concept for the individual who owns a piece of equipment that fails. But there's a cost to the manufacturer, the wider industry and us, the consumers (IMHO). If we force manufacturers to produce enough spares to satisfy all possible repairs over a given period, or - alternatively - to retain facilities (or third-party supplier agreements) to produce spares as required,
and provide distribution and sales of spares to customers, that's going to cost a lot of money. Further, if more failed products are repaired as a result, fewer people will need to buy new replacement products - and that costs money too, in the form of reduced revenue. These costs will have to be recovered somehow if the manufacturer is to remain profitable, and that "somehow" will most likely be increased prices of new equipment - which, in itself, will probably reduce sales as fewer folks will be willing to buy more expensive products.
So, whilst I'd love to be able to buy all necessary spares for my out-of-warranty camera or lens and repair it at home, I'd be doing so at the expense of everyone buying new gear, and potentially at the expense of manufacturers who are already having a tough enough time in today's photography market