Originally posted by mikesbike I have long had the K-5 IIs, also the K-S2 (the predecessor and very similar in design to the K-70), and now the KP. If I had to choose between the K-5 IIs and the K-S2, I would go with my older K-5 IIs, even though the K-S2 has more updated features, such as the articulating screen. The K-S2 is an exceptionally nice entry-level camera and is exceptionally compact for the features it offers, but it (and K-70) is simply not a pro-style design with the finger-tip controls and rugged build quality flagship models such as the K-5 IIs (and your K-7) have. I love the handling of my K-5 IIs in actual use for any need to make changes on the fly. If you can find one with very low use and in pristine condition, I think you would be very satisfied. You are right, it is a couple of oz. lighter than the K-3. This is not a big deal, but enough for me to notice while I'm engaged in many of my activities.
OTOH, if you can somehow land a deal on a KP, this model could be your best choice. I am crazy about mine!
Such great feedback! I keep wavering, but for now, have made an offer on a K-70 on eBay. You can buy a brand-new body only for $546, but sellers are asking well more than $400 for used ones. If had $450 for a used one, I'd just go buy a new one for $100 more. Or get a used one for about $425 at B & H or Adorama with warranty and return acceptance.
If I can't get a K-70 at my price point, I'm going to go for a K-5 IIs and get another lens (a good used one) to go with it. I can do that for about the same price as many of the used K-70 bodies I've seen.
I do like the fact that the controls on the K-5 IIs are so similar to my K-7; I doubt I'd have any trouble getting used to it. But I'm kind of liking the idea of such a new camera. I don't mind buying used and have had great luck, but a newer used one is tempting. We'll see. I'm perfectly happy to go the other route as well.