Originally posted by jatrax am curious, how did you end up with a very new DFA lens and a 13 year old camera?
Me too, it is a mis-match in more ways than even the lack of AF capability. The D-FA lenses are designed for Full Frame (FF) bodies and tend to be more expensive, larger, and heavier than a lens of similar capability designed for APS-C use. The D-FA 28-105 will have a good zoom range on a FF body, like a K-1, but will totally lack any wide angle capability on an APS-C body.
As to the Pentax K100D, it does not have the contacts for using lenses having their own AF motors, which are many. It will work fine for AF with lenses designed to work with the old basic screw-driven system, which also are many. The little kit lens, DA 18-55mm will work fine with it, and is inexpensive. It came in several versions. The newest small kit lens, the DA 18-50mm will not. The K100D Super is the same camera essentially with those contacts added. After having used this camera for quite some time, I found the K200D to be far better. It does tend to under-expose very slightly, which is easy to compensate for when needed, but it offers better resolution, has a much better build quality, including Weather-Resistant (WR) construction, and more advanced control systems. It will AF fine with lenses having their own motors or ones of screw-driven design.
In the case of Nikon, for example, at one point they switched their entry-level DSLRs so they will ONLY AF with lenses having their own motors, and will not AF with any of their lenses designed for screw-driven use- which are many and some being very good lenses! And if shopping for a body having WR construction, in their brand you'd be looking in the $1,000+ USD range for a new camera, and used bodies of this caliber are not cheap either.