Originally posted by tibbitts So when everyone is talking about colors or other rendering advantages from CCD raw images, is there some commonality in the software or other components in the pipeline that is producing these colors?
I used to use Lightroom 6, but in the last few years have mostly switched to Darktable and, sometimes, RawTherapee. All three allow the input colour profile to be selected, and I typically set them to use the embedded profile (or "
embedded matrix") in the DNG file. The embedded matrix is the in-camera profile defined by the manufacturer, and is often calibrated to provide (what the manufacturer thinks is) an appealing look to images, rather than 100% colour accuracy (if I'm striving for best colour accuracy, I use my own profiles created using an X-Rite Colorchecker Passport, or make adjustments to Passport reference shots against a known baseline so that the colours closely match).
The input colour profile undoubtedly has a very significant role to play in the way colours are represented. Still, the input to that profile is native sensor data, and I suspect there may be significant differences in how CCD and CMOS sensors are capturing light and colour - in other words, the native RGB data from one sensor may be far from identical to that from another. As such, I tend to believe it's most likely a
combination of sensor
and colour profile that results in the colours some folks find appealing with CCD sensor cameras.
RawTherapee offers an interesting option to set input colour profile to "
No profile", whereupon it renders the native RGB colours recorded by the sensor. In the near future, I'd like to take some side-by-side shots of the Colorchecker Passport with both my K-3 and Samsung GX-10 (or K10D) - using the same lens, of course - and view them in RawTherapee using this "
No profile" setting, just to see how different (or similar) the native RGB colours are from each camera...