Originally posted by UncleVanya
My input. The first few times I picked up my new KP I was worried. The next day it was as if my brain had processed it over night and it felt great.
Bear in mind I’m an old hand at proper two handed shooting with manual focus film cameras. The proper technique makes it easy to handle (open palm of left hand under the camera - fingers on the lens. Unless the lens is large and then the palm goes under the lens also. )
With the k-3 the grip was easier to actually shoot one handed with an autofocus lens of moderate size and still maintain stability thanks to the grip and ibis.
To me that says the k-3 grip is great but comes at a price - size and perhaps weight. The KP is a good compromise. I’m still trying to decide if the medium or large grip is better for my needs.
This! ^^^ There's a real misleading danger that merely walking into a store to hold a camera for some period of time, which feeling different than what you are used to will result in- "No. I don't like this as well..." being your thought. There may be a period of acclamation.
I also come from years of using Pentax 35mm film SLR bodies having a variety of grip designs, including no actual grip. Among their last designs were the ZX/MZ 5n, and the last one the pro-model MZ-S, both having quite small grips, less even than the largest KP grip. The 35mm film model having a substantial grip similar to those found on APS-C flagship models of today was the very large PZ-1p. I have all three of these. But unlike the previous two bodies, the PZ-1p had no accessory battery grip available. I got so I could very quickly adjust to each design in my holding and usage.
I currently shoot with a flagship model- K-5 IIs, a K-S2, and most often a KP. On lesser occasion, also with my old. larger K20D. The K-S2 is the predecessor of the K-70 and has a very similar design. I have no problem operating with any of them. Yet there are differences, advantages, disadvantages, etc. While I have no problem using my KP in the shooting position, even with a larger lens where I prefer the largest grip, especially for use over a more lengthy period where I will be carrying the camera during waiting intervals but ready to shoot, not just having it hang on my neck or back into my belt holster case. In these circumstances, the grip of my K-2S is a bit better for such handling, while that of my K-5 IIs is better yet. The larger the lens, the more this is true. However, with the KP's accessory battery grip installed, all this changes dramatically! It provides far more gripping surface, even more if held in the vertical orientation. The KP's handling with a large, heavier lens is then far better than with my K-S2 which is similar to the K-70, and even better than my K-5 IIs without its battery grip, which I also have. With the K-S2, like the K-70, there is no further optional battery grip available. Furthermore, with the battery grip, if you now or in the future might sometimes shoot events where you'd rather avoid having to pause for changing batteries, the KP with its battery grip will provide far more shooting time than the K-70 is capable of, and even yet significantly more shooting time than a K-5 IIs or K-3 is capable of without a battery grip.