Originally posted by TDvN57 Considering it, just wish it had a flip screen at the back. Makes low level shots easier on my back. Also waiting to confirm it has an electronic shutter option. Then will move up consideration a notch or two...
I’d much rather use a Platypod to support the camera for low shots and then use my phone for live view/camera control than have the flippy screen. No electronic shutter in initial release, but Wakashiro-san said in one of the CP+ videos that he would like to bring that in a firmware upgrade. (And I expect they will have lots of opportunities for that, since they can feed the machine learning AF algorithms more data sets over time, so they will be wanting to give us updated AF.)
Originally posted by Robot camera When I can get the money together, and if it lives up to expectations (which seems likely) then yes. I do take a few available light candid photos so I want to see what it's like at ISO 9000 or even higher, compared to my K3 at ISO 9000.
Kerrick James has said that ISO 12,800 on the K-3 iii is like ISO 3200 on the K-1 ii. He’s going to use his K-3 iii for his astrophotography shots instead of his full frame, at least until there’s a K-1 iii.
Originally posted by devouges Is the higher ISO something that will be useable ? Seems unrealistic to me. Are there any samples of pics at ISO 1.6m ?
I don’t look at the top ISO so much as the number of stops below the top ISO where you have usable images. That tends to be a fairly consistent gap with Pentax. What we’re seeing is (as mentioned above) discussion of 12,800 being as usable here as 3200 is on the K-1 ii. A couple of ambassadors have said they have shot at 51,200 with this camera and have found the images perfectly usable.
I’ll be preordering the K-3 iii as an upgrade from my K-70 as soon as someone in the US starts taking preorders.
---------- Post added 04-02-21 at 08:30 ----------
Originally posted by Michaelina2 Link to source...?
It’s in the
Wireless Communication Guide.