Definitely not interested, the way the K-3 III has turned out. I am still happy with the performance of my K-5 IIs when I want this style of APS-C camera with its excellently laid-out array of dedicated on-body controls, in a body featuring a built-in flash and long-lasting battery, yet is around 3 oz. lighter than the K-3 III. Its battery grip also will take AA lithiums in case I have been careless in keeping my regular batteries charged up.
I am very happy with my two silver KP bodies. I've had them over 2 years, they have what I need in a much more compact, lightweight, and full-featured design, and they perform marvelously. The KP is a quarter pound lighter than the K-3 III, and with additional useful (to me ) features. I bought a K-1 II instead, which for me completes my FF needs, with the very compact KP forming an ideal FF/ APS-C partnership.
---------- Post added 04-03-21 at 09:53 PM ----------
Originally posted by ThorSanchez Because you're interested in the rather long list of features and improvements the K-3iii has the K1 II doesn't?
Right- but for those who would benefit from those particular improvements. As for me, those improvements would mean little, while I would be giving up what I find useful. I rarely do burst shooting, so I don't need 12 fps. AF performance has been fine with what I have, even for shooting fast action, I almost never have use for video. It is for those who do have such interests, the enhancements of the K-3 III are targeted, and for those who have long had and liked their K-3 II combined with fine APS-C lenses, being now eager for performance-upgrading in a body of similar design.
As for the K-1 II, it is not geared for the likes of burst shooting of high-speed subjects, (though it gave a good account of itself in one comparison test against Nikon and Canon counterparts in shooting a fast-moving dirt bike), the kind of thing the K-3 III is targeted for, nor should it be. For extensive use of this kind, the smaller files of an advanced, high-performing APS-C design would be more appropriate for most people, along with the greater reach and lighter weight needed for a lens providing that reach. The K-1 II, OTOH, also has a list of features missing on the K-3 III. Its VF is even bigger, it has the built-in GPS, It has the pull-out angle-screen, and it does what FF can do, like providing the original FOV of FF lenses, which can make a huge difference in their appeal. With the FA 31mm Ltd, for one example, the lens functions in its original form as a very high quality fast-aperture wide angle, the likes of which is not available for APS-C.