I find it kind of amusing that people say "but the detail at ISO 6400".
If you put yourself in a situation where ISO 6400 is needed, you already show you don't care about minimal loss of detail... Buy some floodlights!
---------- Post added 04-29-21 at 06:01 AM ----------
Originally posted by iheiramo OMG!!! Again?
On which decade that other site lives on? Yes, you might see some loss of hair detail if pixel peeped at 200% on K1ii. Terrible baking. IRL it makes results better than without it.
One of the comparisons said that there was detail loss on the K-3iii image compared to the Fuji (using different lenses), while the Pentax had slightly *better* detail on parts of the image and slightly worse on others. Almost as if the lens used and other parts of the processing play a part
This accelerator basically just saves time and any complaint is academical at best.
Last edited by Serkevan; 04-29-2021 at 06:02 AM.