Originally posted by normhead Now I'm curious, what didn't you like about the K-P?
Ergonomics. For me they were terrible.
None of the grips were supportive for me (I often shoot one-handed), button placement was bad and especially the BBF, and the top controls were too cramped. As a camera tho it was marvelous and a couple of the features were helpful, which really was the reason I bought it in the first place, even if at the end of the day I didn't find any substantive difference from the K-70 for my own images and subject interests. It wasn't either smaller or lighter either which I expected it would be based on early comments. The K-70 is simply an easier and more secure carry for me.
So the KP and I just weren't a good match, and I really did try. Took it to every shooting opportunity, the majority either portraiture or wildlife, for several months along with a K-70. I started out excitedly relying on the KP as my primary but rather soon found myself picking up the K70 more often than not when things became fast-paced. Turned out the KP was a brief fling, a summer girlfriend.
I wish there had been somewhere I could have handled it first, but I might have bought it anyway since I believed some of its features not offered on the K70 would have been used more than they were, and of course I'd just adapt to the handling. Specs got me. It obviously does not mean others are not enthusiastic about their KP's and had little issue with the ergonomics.
Of all the Pentax DSLR's I've owned (K50, K5, K70, KP, K1, K3III) it's the one camera that you most likely either love or hate.