Originally posted by Bauie I will take arrived, a 18-135 DA, first pics on the K-x on f8 look great. I take it from the comments that the K70 will do much better in low light conditions than my K-x, is that correct?
Once again, thank you so much for your replies.
Excellent lens choice! I have many premium lenses, but often turn to this one.
Indeed, the K-70 will be even better for lower noise and quality preservation at higher ISO settings over the K-x. As for my own experience, I owned the very similar, but slightly upgraded next model after the K-x, the 12mp K-r as my lightweight DSLR model for some years. It was better for dealing with low lighting/higher ISO than my flagship 14.7mp K20D at this time, which I had bought new at 1/2 price after it was replaced b the K-7. I got many fine shots from the K-r, and as a lighter-weight walk-around alternative. Then I got the subsequent 16mp K-5, then the K-5 IIs as my flagship models, both new at about 1/2 price after the arrival of the next flagship, the K-3. I noticed its low light/higher ISO performance was even a bit better than the K-r, and resolution looked at least as good as the K20D, but definitely better in dynamic range. However, I did notice better fine detail in images from the K-5 IIs, no doubt due to the AA filter being omitted- indicated by the "s". Of course, being a flagship model the VF is better than the K-r, but the K-r still being the more compact, lightweight alternative.
Eventually the 20mp K-S2 replaced the K-r as entry-level, but with many upgrades, including the pro-level 100% VF, yet still close to the K-r in size and weight. Quite a remarkable advancement in this class of camera. This model as well as all models since have omitted the AA filter, but have another such filter that can be switched in if there should be a moire problem in the subject matter. This designing is unique to Pentax as far as I know. I a new K-S2 in early 2016 at a terrific closeout price after the K-70 arrived. I then gave away the K-r. For me, I could see a difference in imaging detail compared to the K-r, but not when compared to the K-5 IIs. Eventually, I acquired the 24mp KP, and was pleasantly surprised that I could detect even a bit better fine detail in images from it! I still love and use my K-S2 when I want its special features with its small size, and my K-5 IIs when I want its control features and fine capabilities. Though the KP is tops, imaging with these two cameras is still excellent.
Less than 2 years ago now, I finally decided to add the Full Frame K-1 II with its excellent FA 28-105mm kit lens. My having some superb FF lenses, bought many years ago for use with my Pentax 35mm film cameras, pushed me in this direction, as I am very happy to use these once again in their respective angle or field-of-view. Imaging and low-light/higher ISO performance and overall image quality have been outstanding. That said, my KP can push quite close to the performance of the K-1 II, an amazing accomplishment! The KP is a beautifully-made camera, with wonderfully refined engineering and imaging.
Since you are accustomed to shooting medium-format film, it should be interesting to see how close you might find the mage quality to be from the more advanced APS-C DSLR models, whether the K-70 or the KP.
Last edited by mikesbike; 04-12-2022 at 06:31 PM.