Originally posted by Dubesor I'm glad I bit the bullet. My initial plan was to slowly upgrade my Pentax DSLR system and *also* invest in a lower-end medium format system in 2009 (ie. Kiev or Fuji). I'm now doubting that medium-format would be a very practical foray, as I doubt image quality would get *much* better than on the K20D. Maybe someone on here has closer experience with both K20D and MF photography and can enlighten us?
I have a lot of experience with medium format. The Pentax 645 was my baby, along with a set of ungodly expensive lenses. I would have to respectfully but completely disagree with you about image quality/resolution/etc when comparing any digital camera to a medium format.
Bottom line, there is simply no comparison!
Pentax has (or is going to) release a 645 digital camera (18 megapixels - are they kidding, that's all?) but even that will not likely reach the dynamic range and resolution of medium format film.
But alas, I no longer do film for practical and environmental reasons. I am happy with the trade-offs and the 14 mega pixels of the K20D... but I am not fooling myself, this is no medium format.