Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
01-27-2009, 07:29 PM   #31
Veteran Member
PentaxPoke's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,411
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by Ratmagiclady Quote
If the extra magnification isn't to my liking, (and it might well be, really) How's it held in?
I never took a close look to see. I think it might be a press-fit. BTW, you can see the magnification in the pictures I posted. What do you think of it?

01-27-2009, 07:52 PM   #32
Ratmagiclady's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: GA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 13,476
QuoteOriginally posted by PentaxPoke Quote
I never took a close look to see. I think it might be a press-fit. BTW, you can see the magnification in the pictures I posted. What do you think of it?
Not really sure. It could be helpful. It's possible any real deal-killer would be if there's any perceived distortion or any such thing more toward the corners. My eyesight issues are kind of quirky and inconsistent, being mostly a matter of them being prone to fatigue, so clarity might be more at issue than the magnification per se. I imagine it couldn't hurt, as regards focusing near the center, anyway.

I think it would be *very* useful for fine-tuning the focus on my lenses, being sure they're happy at zero, anyway. What I'm figuring is that it's worth a thirty dollar try or so, and if I don't like it for regular shooting, at least I have a bit more eyecup.

(One would wish Pentax or someone would just make an eyepiece with deeper rubber to it, at least. That can make a lot of difference. I often miss the Canon FD eyecups I'm used to, in that way. )

Last edited by Ratmagiclady; 01-27-2009 at 08:19 PM.
01-28-2009, 09:24 PM   #33
Forum Member

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 60
KPS 1.3x magnifier

I just got my KPS 1.3x magnifiying eyepiece w/ eyecup.

It makes a real difference!!

It's not any dimmer; i can still see all 4 corners, and the viewfinder info. Love it!
01-28-2009, 10:03 PM   #34
Veteran Member
rfortson's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston TX
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,129
I've used it since my K100D and I've found it very useful. I generally don't wear glasses when I take pictures, but on the occasions I've tried leaving my glasses on, I did find it inconvenient.

For the price, though, I think it's steal.

01-30-2009, 10:49 AM   #35
Site Supporter
filmamigo's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 686
QuoteOriginally posted by dugrant153 Quote
I'm actually experimenting with an old film camera: a TOPCON IC-1 Auto (Can you believe it?? And it still works!). The viewfinder on this camera is magnificent!! It is amazingly huge. Feels like I don't have a camera mashed against my face as the view ALMOST feels like I'm just seeing through my own eyes! The K200D and K100D viewfinders are quite slim, providing almost a 'tunnel vision' feel to them in comparison. They're good compared against the competition in the same price range, but ... I dunno. I kinda want to shoot film now just to get that massive viewfinder!!
Amen --- that's the same feeling I get every time I lift my Program Plus to my eye.

I also want to add that I made a much more meaningful upgrade to my viewfinder than the magnifying eyepiece... I bought a K10D. The pentaprism is definitely better than the pentamirror.
02-02-2009, 11:06 AM   #36
Ratmagiclady's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: GA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 13,476
So, I just ordered one of these, thought I'd say thanks to Poke for putting this review up: it actually proved helpful, particularly the pictures.

I took some time to deliberately pay only-half-attention-to-what-I-do as regards nudging my glasses aside and mooshing em between my cheek and the LCD (this is actually about as inelegant as it sounds,) and what I determined was, there's a pretty good chance the magnification won't hurt a thing and should be helpful.

Stay tuned, I guess.
02-02-2009, 05:56 PM   #37
Forum Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 56
Didn't fit to me. I couldn't see all the corners so I returned it right away. I wear no glasses.
02-24-2009, 12:19 PM   #38
Veteran Member
dave9t5's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada & Taichung, Taiwan
Photos: Albums
Posts: 316

Where did you buy O-ME53 in Toronto?


02-24-2009, 01:23 PM   #39
Senior Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Parallax's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: South Dakota
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 15,622
Mine seems about useless also. The magnification isn't enough to make any difference, and certainly not enough to make the loss of viewable area of the viewfinder worth while.
02-24-2009, 01:49 PM   #40
Veteran Member
Venturi's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,639
QuoteOriginally posted by PentaxPoke Quote
I never took a close look to see. I think it might be a press-fit. BTW, you can see the magnification in the pictures I posted. What do you think of it?
The whole assembly comes apart and goes back together very easily. You'll need a jewler's philips head screw driver and you'll want some plastic tweezers or foreceps to handle the glass. There are four screws that hold the two halves of the "chassis" together. Two elements make up the lens, spaced apart by a platic ring. I disassembled mine so I could properly clean a fingerprint off the front element - it's nye-on impossible to get the edges cleaned while assembled because the front element is convex.

FWIW removing the elements out won't alleviate the vignetting or obstruction of the data bar in the view finder. The shape and size of the "aperture" itself is what causes this. If they'd designed it 2-3mm taller the vignetting would probably dissappear completely for most users.

I also think some of the difference in people's experience with the vignetting has to do with their facial structure around the eye. I have a pronounced brow (insert cromagnon or neanderthal jokes) and I have to kind of prop my eyebrow over the top of the eyepiece to get past the vignetting. It's not uncomfortable, but requires conscious thought on my part.

I'm still up in the air about it. It is handy for macro/MF shooting, and I do like the extra relief it provides me since I'm left-eyed. But a KatzEye with OptiBrite will rock your world in MF, and a 2x right-angle finder or even live view is probably more often practical for macro work.

I've been forcing myself to use the O-ME53 for a little over a week now to see if it's something I'll get use to or if I really just don't care for it; right now I'm still leaning towards the "not for me" camp. By the end of next week I'll either choose to keep it or there will be another used but well cared for O-ME53 available in the marketplace.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, exposure, eyecup, magnification, o-me53, photography, test, tests, view, viewfinder
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: O-ME53 Magnifying Eyecup Igilligan Sold Items 3 07-15-2008 06:21 AM
magnifier eyecup O-ME53 distorted_vision Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 3 11-26-2007 06:22 PM
For Sale - Sold: FS: O-ME53 Magnifying Eyecup. Ed in GA Sold Items 0 10-13-2007 08:06 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:57 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]