Originally posted by DAVID564 Let's face it if you want long exposures digital has a long way to go better to stick
with film. however for reletively short exposures to 40 sec's "B" mode
You're kidding right? Tongue in cheek? Right?
Few and certainly fewer pro-astrophotographers use film any more. Digital is the way to go for many reasons. One big reason is instant results, no more gas hypering (re: reciprocity failure reducer), lower magnitude gains, shorter exposures, digital stacking of shorter (sometimes hundreds) exposures, etc. etc...
Film is gone, gone, gone!! And though I have many fond memories of the yesteryears, I am very happy with what can be done with good digital imagers! That is both day time and night time photography!
Sorry and no offence intended but you couldn't be more wrong.
Originally posted by DAVID564 This mode not possible with 70's- 80's cameras as the move to electronics ment battery power, which could not keep a mirror up and shutter open for extended periods ?
Not entirely true, the amount of power required to keep a shutter open was negligible...yes, it did drain them a bit (those little button cells) but I well remember taking many hour long exposures with these cameras. Remember, in normal use, those batteries lasted, at least, a year or so. But I do remember building an external battery pack for long exposures in the winter.