Originally posted by RiceHigh 6MP is just too little by today's minimum standard
"Today's minimum standard" doesn't exist.
If you don't want to print poster size and don't want to crop too much, 6MP are plenty. The K100D is a very capable camera and more than sufficient for many people.
Originally posted by Marc Sabatella You *are* aware that more pixels means more noise for the same sensor size & technology, aren't you?
Noise correlates with sensor size but not with pixel density. If you increase the number of pixels and keep the sensor size the same each individual pixel of the higher pixel density will have worse noise performance but averaged over the whole image, the images of the higher pixel density sensor will have the same noise (everything else being equal) and the finer grained noise will be more pleasant to look at. Having said that, most of the time "everything else" won't be "equal". The sensor technologies between K100D and K-m are different. The K100D uses the tried and tested SONY 6MP sensor, that is also used in the Nikon D40. It's a good one.
Originally posted by bx6768 How about K100D as my first Pentax DSLR?
If you can find the "super" variant, you'll be able to use SDM lenses. The new DA 55mm, for example, is SDM only. But there are plenty of screw drive AF lenses to choose from.
With respect to the K-m (K2000): Check whether you like a really small camera (K-m) or one that fits well into a man's hands (K100). The K100 has a top LCD display which I find very handy and, to the best of my knowledge, is missing from the K-m. I also like the spread out AF sensors which help me to avoid recomposing after focussing or at least keep the movement to a minimum. I'm sure there are further differences between the cameras. Its worth checking which features float your boat and chose accordingly.