The K100D series will likely not be enough of an upgrade to justify the money, especially if you don't care much about SR. The K100D has the SAME sensor as the *istDL so image quality difference is negligible, especially if you're shooting in RAW, where there should be almost NO difference whatsoever. They also have the SAME pentamirror viewfinder as the *istDL, so...
Especially by going to a K110D, you're accomplishing almost nothing, except YES, you would get greater flexibility with focus points. The K100D Super would give you SDM and SR, but if you say you don't care much about that, just save your money, skip the K200D too, and get a K10D. It has a brighter, larger pentaprism viewfinder and is an improvement over the DL in almost every aspect.
Quick rundown of the differences:
* K100D Super: Has a dust removal feature (which barely works, honestly), SDHC (big SD card) support, and support for SDM lenses.
* K100D: Has shake reduction.
* K110D: A K100D without SR.
P.S. No one thinks they "need" Shake Reduction until they try it... But when you get used to it, anything else than a camera with built in SR just feels crippled.