Well, if you insist;
this is an old well worn topic and frankly your 'wish list' is typically droll and pedestrian. Where is your imagination?
The all improved:
K10^6dXIII(enhanced).
The camera of the future needs to be multi-powered; all for cheap. Say an inboard nuclear reactor for main power and then for the green folks a solar panel and a wind turbine as back-up. An extra accessory here would be electricity from sea-water--drop a couple of electrodes in a glass of salty water and POW-instant spark! And the side effect would be desalination to drinking water standards! There is a similar power set-up for our new 650 gigawatt-second external flash--fully adjustable from simple tan through crispy-critter to atomic dust.
Buffer-smuffer. The future picto-capture-box will be multi-radio capable. A microwave set-up for immediate frame dumping to any nearby computer or photo kiosk-and they will be everywhere. A long wave rig for remote locations and underwater--yep, its waterproof to five mile depth at least. You just specify the end location with the handy fold-away keyboard and pop-up flat screen monitor panel (available up to billboard dimensions) and the photos get where they need to be right from the camera (we use the new trans-warp multi sampling hyper internet transfer protocol, 3-d imaging so real actual people have been teleported from continent to continent in the blink of an eye-there is no truth in the rumor that they arrive severely aged or dead by the process) .
Noise, well now that you mention it, noise will be better. Each image will have inboard audio. You can select from any of your pirated music tracks, an actual capture of the conversations ongoing when the shot is being composed and captured or a computer voice spewing all the particulars of the exposure---all delivered along with the image to the recipient of your choice.
Frame speed will be finger pressure dependent: a light touch for a single snap, mash it good for a movie quality stream of images at 100MP resolution or greater.
If you can see it (or imagine it) we've go the lens to go along. Zero to 4000mm, insta-zoom with insta-auto aperture and insta-auto focus. Constant f/0.1 at all focal lengths. All coupled to our new eye tracker device (patent pending). This sucker reads small eye movements and keeps the lens locked on what ever you can see. Some small bugs need to be ironed out and that rumor of spine-ripping injury due to rapid eye movement and blinking are purely speculation and internet gossip.
Lets talk portability. This little gem self folds into an object the size of a quarter dollar. As soon as we trim some of it's 3/4 ton weight it will be pocket portable. Oh, and that folding mechanism--there is no truth to the other rumor that the gravitation field of the planet is adversely effected when the camera folds up like a small black-hole collapsing.
Anticipated deliver date is just short of the-end-of-time, but we plan on being out ahead of schedule.
Originally posted by Phil Taylor So what would you want in a pro DSLR from Pentax? Do you feel the 645D is the way to go and forget about creating a APS-C style one (for higher MP reasons) and if a pro body was available, do you feel the lenses are up to it (not talking about sharpness, contrast etc here but more AF speeds etc)?
Personally I'm pleased they came out with the K10D first but I also think we've been waiting long enough. I wouldn't care what came first, APS-C as I feel for most situations 10MP is more than enough or 645D (but let me buy up cheap lenses first
)
I think it must be an all in one unit or it wont be taken seriously i.e. no seperate battery pack). Put out a consumer priced body with the same sensor and processing gear and sort out any problems first.
I'd like to see faster buffer times, shooting speeds and better noise reduction.
I'd like the lenses AF to be faster and PLEASE bring back fixed aperture zooms.
And bring it out slightly AHEAD of the promised date!