Originally posted by HermanLee Well fyi, I'm not trying to bash K20D by comparing it to D700.
What I want to know is exactly what feature on D700 that makes the obvious difference that I saw. Is it because of the DR / pixel size / software / other "X" factor that I'm not aware of.
I know for sure that it is ridiculous to expect my $700 camera to perform at the same level of $2700 camera.
Originally posted by danielchtong I think a lot of people have commented on it.
I would rather use the car analogy. In terms of price difference, it is almost like Herman was testing drive a Corolla in a car showroom and afterwards he also did a BMW 7 series sportcar or an Audi v8.
Daniel
Daniel, in case you missed my post up there on first page of this thread, I've quoted it here.
Again I must emphasize that I am NOT whining why my K20D is not as good as D700.
I'm just simply asking what exactly is the "Technical Thing" that makes the difference.
Maybe I should have rephrase my thread title to avoid this big misunderstanding.
Originally posted by Wheatfield I guess the real question is why are you comparing cars on a camera forum in the first place?
If I recall, the OP wanted to know why the noise was better in the D700 than the K20.
By your logic, the answer is "This isn't a valid question".
That logic is a flawed as comparing cameras to cars in the first place.
Wheatfield, THANK YOU for your understanding my real intention.
I can understand why every time people see ".... VS...." (in this case K20D VS D700) on a thread title, they become defensive.
But again, this is not that kind of thread. So for those who got emotional right away by reading my thread title, please....sit back, relax, and try to understand what the question really is