Originally posted by walro Tell me again why we're comparing cameras that are vastly different in price. If anything, it's a compliment to the image quality of the K20 that it's being compared against those cameras at all. Who expects a camera that costs less than $1,000 to perform as well as a camera that costs a couple thousand? I don't.
Well fyi, I'm not trying to bash K20D by comparing it to D700.
What I want to know is exactly what feature on D700 that makes the obvious difference that I saw. Is it because of the DR / pixel size / software / other "X" factor that I'm not aware of.
I know for sure that it is ridiculous to expect my $700 camera to perform at the same level of $2700 camera.
OMG, what is that creature?
For sure it will scare any Nikonian around
...now back to business. Seriously, do you still use this camera? Any sample from photo taken with it? I always thought that this kind of camera is only for collection.