Originally posted by Peter Zack I'm really disappointed with seeing these overhead comparison shots. I've been looking at all the threads of size comparisons and pictures anywhere I could find them on the net. Photo #8 just showed me I'll be selling my gear at the end of this year if a new, larger body doesn't come out in the next model.
I'm a left eye shooter. I'm 75% blind in the right eye and can't shoot with the right eye. I was concerned that the body was so much narrower (24mm) and I'd have trouble with my nose covering the rear buttons and making the rear e dial hard to use. If you look at the 8th picture and notice that the eye cup on the K-7 is almost flush with the body, there's no way I'll be able to use this camera.
I love the K20D but where I have issues is shooting weddings in low light and at higher ISO's. It just ain't that great. So what I wanted in a new camera was better high ISO shooting and a little better low light AF. Well it seems we got that.
But they have abandoned people like me. If this is the trend, and I would guess it is, the small body won't work for me. Since everyone is so excited by the small body size, I don't expect that new models will go back to the K20D size.
Look for a big sale of Pentax gear coming in the fall. I can't afford to carry a full Pentax kit and get a 5DMkII and related lenses etc.
It's been a fun ride for the last 28 years....
.
Peter,
Something is wrong with that overhead picture. The standard K-20 eyepiece does not stick out like the one in that picture. I just checked on mine. It looks just like the K-7. The k20d in that picture must have an O-ME53 or another after market eyepiece. In fact I am almost positive it is the O-ME53 if you look at it from the back view.
When left-eye viewing for me on the k20d, my nose ends up around the OK button, but is still comfortable. Geometrically, the buttons relative to the eyepiece on the K-7 are similar, so I would expect that if the k20d was comfortable left-eye, then I can't see how the K-7 would be worse.