Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
05-27-2009, 07:22 PM   #1
Veteran Member
Ivan Glisin's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Belgrade
Posts: 656
K10D/K-7 viewfinders comparison

Here is the difference between K10D and K-7 viewfinders. I took K-7 viewfinder picture at Pentax booth at Henry's show in Toronto with my Finepix F20 at identical focal length to what I did at home with my K10D, which should realistically represent apparent viewfinder sizes.

This is the confirmation of my initial side-by-side test at the first day of the show using Mike's K20D and K-7 where I have noticed that K-7 viewfinder appeared a bit larger. Here is what to expect:

Name:  K10D-K7-viewfinders.jpg
Views: 5900
Size:  19.2 KB

05-27-2009, 08:16 PM   #2
Veteran Member
PentaxPoke's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,411
Very nice. Thanks for posting this. The k10d/k20d had probably the best APS-C viewfinder of any camera brand, and it is nice to see confirmed the K-7 will be even larger.
05-27-2009, 09:13 PM   #3
Ash
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,920
That's a nice improvement, although the OME53 loupe makes an even better improvement!
05-28-2009, 03:41 AM   #4
Senior Member
jfsavage's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 211
Just to confirm, this is how big the viewfinder itself appears to the eye, rather than the coverage of the viewfinder, right?

05-28-2009, 07:36 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Ivan Glisin's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Belgrade
Posts: 656
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by jfsavage Quote
Just to confirm, this is how big the viewfinder itself appears to the eye, rather than the coverage of the viewfinder, right?
Correct. This is the "visible" difference: by shooting through both viewfinders with the same camera at identical focal length positioned in the same way at the eyepiece it is possible to show the difference in the apparent sizes, which very closely approximates what our eye would see.
05-28-2009, 09:14 PM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kaunas
Posts: 1,458
QuoteOriginally posted by PentaxPoke Quote
The k10d/k20d had probably the best APS-C viewfinder of any camera brand, and it is nice to see confirmed the K-7 will be even larger.
Nikon D300 viewfinder is still better. 100% coverage and 0.94× magnification.
05-28-2009, 09:33 PM   #7
Veteran Member
soccerjoe5's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,343
QuoteOriginally posted by PentaxPoke Quote
Very nice. Thanks for posting this. The k10d/k20d had probably the best APS-C viewfinder of any camera brand, and it is nice to see confirmed the K-7 will be even larger.
Actually the D300 has a larger and brighter viewfinder

05-31-2009, 08:32 PM   #8
Veteran Member
code4code5's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 438
This ain't really the place, but I put my K1000 to my eye a couple days ago and was amazed at how big and bright it was. I know it's apples and oranges, but you would think that they could tweak the pentaprism to give us a larger field of view on APS.
06-01-2009, 03:36 AM   #9
Senior Member
jfsavage's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 211
Full Frame will give a bigger magnification - the Canon 5D has a great viewfinder. On the other hand the four thirds system is like looking through a key hole ;{
06-01-2009, 04:32 AM   #10
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Borås, Sweden
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,169
QuoteOriginally posted by code4code5 Quote
This ain't really the place, but I put my K1000 to my eye a couple days ago and was amazed at how big and bright it was. I know it's apples and oranges, but you would think that they could tweak the pentaprism to give us a larger field of view on APS.
You could, but it'd make the image darker.
06-01-2009, 06:56 AM   #11
Veteran Member




Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: London
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 417
QuoteOriginally posted by jfsavage Quote
Full Frame will give a bigger magnification - the Canon 5D has a great viewfinder. On the other hand the four thirds system is like looking through a key hole ;{
Theres so many problems with the four thirds system its hard to work out how olympus manage to sell a "profesional" DSLR and charge so much for all their lenses.
An olympus was my first DSLR and even then i knew something wasnt right.
Their marketing team must be legendary
06-01-2009, 07:09 AM   #12
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Borås, Sweden
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,169
QuoteOriginally posted by IsaacEastgate Quote
Theres so many problems with the four thirds system its hard to work out how olympus manage to sell a "profesional" DSLR and charge so much for all their lenses.
An olympus was my first DSLR and even then i knew something wasnt right.
Their marketing team must be legendary
Marketing team must be good enough to pull the wool over the eyes of the dpreview guys too, since they rate the Olympus DSLRs quite high.

I've shot a bit with an E-3 and it's an extremely well built camera, with very fast autofocus and some great lenses available. Sure, high ISO isn't great, but you can't have it all.
06-02-2009, 07:55 PM   #13
Veteran Member
soccerjoe5's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,343
QuoteOriginally posted by pingflood Quote
You could, but it'd make the image darker.
I wonder how Olympus managed to do this on the E-3. It's got a big and bright VF and it's magnification is more than 1x.
06-02-2009, 10:34 PM   #14
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Borås, Sweden
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,169
QuoteOriginally posted by soccerjoe5 Quote
I wonder how Olympus managed to do this on the E-3. It's got a big and bright VF and it's magnification is more than 1x.
I should have qualified that with "all else being equal". Changes to the pentaprism/mirror and focusing screen would definitely affect the output.. but in the end, you only have X amount of light coming in and if everything else remains the same spreading it out across a bigger area makes it dimmer.
06-04-2009, 07:11 AM   #15
Senior Member
jfsavage's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 211
QuoteOriginally posted by soccerjoe5 Quote
I wonder how Olympus managed to do this on the E-3. It's got a big and bright VF and it's magnification is more than 1x.
I only ever looked at the lower end Olympus cameras, and they were 'keyhole viewfinders', which removed Olympus from my consideration immediately. How does the E-3 compare with the K20 - have they managed to make it as big and bright? If they have, then bigger viewfinders should be possible for APS-C cameras as well. One of the things I loved about the Canon 5D was the viewfinder.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, k-7, k10d, photography, viewfinder, viewfinders

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparison between k-x and k10d (IQwise) deathdream Pentax DSLR Discussion 7 10-10-2010 02:30 PM
fun *ist DS - K10D comparison SouthShoreRob Post Your Photos! 2 03-04-2008 06:35 PM
Interesting K10d K20d comparison PentaxPoke Pentax DSLR Discussion 24 03-04-2008 11:37 AM
comparison of pentax/canon viewfinders raz Pentax DSLR Discussion 2 06-03-2007 11:15 AM
Direct comparison *ist-D vs K10D sandpiper6 Pentax DSLR Discussion 4 12-14-2006 06:04 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:49 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top