Originally posted by RiceHigh
-edit-
Another reason for the K-7 is the video function, which undoubtedly can be quite handy for travelling and shooting children/pets.
Originally posted by Stefan Carey My experience has been the video is much more useful than one expects especially if you have children or family around. I found joining lots of short 30-second to 60-second segments makes a great "time lapse" style movie.
Rice High, Since you know as much about Pentax as any of our so called 'experts'/fan boys, I am a bit confused with your quote about the Video being useful for Kids and Pets...
And Stefan I absolutely agree that a semi-functioning video would be very useful feature to have with a DSLR...
The K7 will have no AF capabilities in video mode! That makes it almost completely useless for "Kids and Pets". Maybe a still flower or a tripod mounted Landscape video of some city street.
But Kids or pets or anything moving, going in and out of focus at full High Def... forget it! That will be pure torture to look at.
I just stuck my Video camera in Manual focus and attempted to take the "Kids and Pets" video shots. It is really unpleasant to look at... and that is with the big DOF of a small sensor video camera. Imagine the limitations at the smaller DOF of a F2.8 lens... ( I also plan to use video for the artsy shallow dof 'movie-esque' shots... so MF will be fine for those) But not for shots of Little Billy running and playing with Rover.
I shoot almost exclusively MF lenses on the K20 so I am getting pretty good and faster at manually focusing lenses for still shots... But to have to watch a video of me attempting to MF track moving kids... even I would not watch that.
Rice High... get your collectors edition 'Olive' camera and wait for the price to drop on the K7... (the second part is what I am going to do)
Wait a minute, with all the positive attention your blog has drawn to the Pentax platform, I am shocked they do not give you a copy of the new cameras when they are released!