Originally posted by Photong Also keep in mind the size difference. As a recovering Canon guy, the current price of a used 5D was very tempting. However, factoring in its size compared to the K-7, the latter is more likely to be taken to places that afford photo opportunities. What good is clean 3200ISO if you won't use it often.
Adam
My sentiments entirely. After you've compared prices, specifications, FPS/ISO/NOISE/AF and all the rest there are also other considerations such as weight, size, ergonomics, ease of use/handling, compatibility with classic lenses and so on
Most modern DSLRs will be able to deliver very good quality pictures. Admittedly for 'some' occasions/special conditions such as fast moving sports etc, there will be better suited cameras with higher FPS or faster AF, but for me, taking all this into account, the best camera is one that I will happily take with me because it is lighter, compact and easy to use and retain the spontaneity that I enjoy in photography.
This was a major factor in why I bought an LX in 1981 instead of a Nikon F3 or Canon F1, and the major reason I'll be buying a K7 instead of a 5D or D300/700.
They all take great pictures, but the comfortable fit of a Pentax LX or K7 in my hand swings it for me, all other considerations being 'more or less' equal. I just find the equivalent Nikons and Canons that little bit too heavy and clunky for my liking. It's very personal but makes all the difference between a camera I carry around with me and one that sits in a cupboard or camera bag most of its life.