Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!

SpartanWarrior · 09-02-2009, 07:38 AM

Here is a Photo of my Daughter
K7, DA 35 2.8 Limited Macro, ISO 1600, f2.8, Converted from RAW to Jpeg no PP only resize

pcarfan · 09-02-2009, 07:53 AM

pcarfan · 09-02-2009, 07:55 AM

Originally posted by lastdodobird

Does increasing the EV help with high iso shots?

I did these test shots a few hours ago (DA40/2.8 + K100D @ ISO3200, f5.6) with +0.7EV and they seem to come out better...

All I can say is "WOW"

systemA · 09-02-2009, 07:16 PM

Originally posted by lastdodobird

Taken with a K100D + DA40/2.8

ISO3200, f5.6

Knew I saw this somewhere! Greets from head-fi

planedriver · 09-08-2009, 09:43 AM

K200D DA16-45
16mm, f4, iso 1250, 1/15, -1EV, no PP

K200D DA16-45
16mm, f4, iso 1600, 1/5, no PP

K200D F35-105
105mm, f5.6, iso 1600, 1/8, no PP

Cheers Andras

jgredline · 09-08-2009, 10:11 AM

These are straight from the K20D....no pp done aside from cropping and resizing. I shot these in black and white as Jpegs...
All hand held

ISO3200

ISO3200

jgredline · 09-08-2009, 10:21 AM

ISO 3200
mY wife chimping her nikon

ISO3200

ISO6400

ISO6400...(NOTE: de-noised in CS3, increased exposer and contrast)

Jewelltrail · 09-08-2009, 11:59 AM

Quote:

jgredline: These are straight from the K20D....no pp done aside from cropping and resizing. I shot these in black and white as Jpegs...
All hand held

Wow! Jarvier, which lens are you using here?

jgredline · 09-08-2009, 12:50 PM

Originally posted by Jewelltrail

Wow! Jarvier, which lens are you using here?

Thanks, while not the greatest of photos, I thought they where pretty ok.
I was using my beloved Tamron 17-35f/2.8-4.0...What an amazing lens this is.

danielchtong · 09-08-2009, 02:03 PM

If you feel like counting facial hair or noise pixel go for the original of this lowly & cheapo DL iso 1600 shot done in 2006. Lens used was FA135mm . I had to use F6.7 to get both subjects in focus and I had to crank up iso to compensate for a no-flash situation.

High resolution monitor is preferred for this image (my all time favorite demo for low noise sensor)

IMGP8141.JPG photo - Daniel TONG photos at pbase.com

Daniel

Jewelltrail · 09-09-2009, 10:06 AM

Quote:

jgredline:Thanks, while not the greatest of photos, I thought they where pretty ok.
I was using my beloved Tamron 17-35f/2.8-4.0...What an amazing lens this is.

"pretty ok" ---pics at 3200 with clarity, contrast and sharpness like this="pretty ok"? r u serious?

Yes, that lens is a winner. If I opt to sell my Tammy 17-50 and replace it with the 28-75, this lens would fill in admirably for the gap I would then have below 28mm. However, I do not see these 17-35s---anywhere. This LBA thing never rests, instead it always has my mind envisioning all possible permutations (affordable and not) of various lens collections.

Quote:

danielchtong: (my all time favorite demo for low noise sensor)

Yes, it sure is. I heard this sensor is excellent with noise, but it is more convincing to see it here--thanks.

jgredline · 09-09-2009, 10:30 AM

I had the 17-50 Tamron version and it did not compare to the 17-35 in quality or focus speed.

jgredline · 09-09-2009, 10:31 AM

By the way. The rest of the series is here.
Life on the train - jgredline's Photos
Many at ISO 6400 and all the exif is intact.

pcarfan · 09-09-2009, 04:04 PM

Shot at iso 3200 and pushed 1.5 EV in PP for an iso 9600 (equivalent). Used noiseware pro and masking.

wolfier · 09-09-2009, 09:32 PM

Excellent pic as usual, pcarfan! Goes to show that in the right situation, there's a place for any ISO

Originally posted by pcarfan

Shot at iso 3200 and pushed 1.5 EV in PP for an iso 9600 (equivalent). Used noiseware pro and masking.

09-02-2009, 07:53 AM	#167
pcarfan Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,978	K-7, iso3200. Sigma 10-20.

09-08-2009, 10:11 AM	#171
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628	These are straight from the K20D....no pp done aside from cropping and resizing. I shot these in black and white as Jpegs... All hand held ISO3200 ISO3200 ISO3200 ISO3200 ISO3200

09-08-2009, 10:21 AM	#172
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628	ISO 3200 mY wife chimping her nikon ISO3200 ISO3200 ISO3200 ISO6400 ISO6400...(NOTE: de-noised in CS3, increased exposer and contrast)

09-09-2009, 04:04 PM	#179
pcarfan Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,978	Iso 9600 Shot at iso 3200 and pushed 1.5 EV in PP for an iso 9600 (equivalent). Used noiseware pro and masking.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
How to post high resolution photo here?	Underbridge	Pentax Medium Format	5	12-25-2012 08:56 PM
People K-5 high ISO... how high can we really go...	igor	Post Your Photos!	2	03-24-2012 01:10 AM
Is there a high iso gallery for K-7?	justtakingpics	Pentax DSLR Discussion	13	05-31-2010 05:32 PM
K-7 high ISO vs K20D high ISO	supa007	Pentax DSLR Discussion	72	05-10-2010 04:24 PM
Pentax k20d High ISO Photo Gallery	PentaxPoke	Pentax DSLR Discussion	68	02-18-2009 05:19 AM

09-02-2009, 07:38 AM	#166
SpartanWarrior Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Sparta, Greece. Posts: 104	Here is a Photo of my Daughter K7, DA 35 2.8 Limited Macro, ISO 1600, f2.8, Converted from RAW to Jpeg no PP only resize

09-02-2009, 07:55 AM	#168
pcarfan Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Dayton, Ohio Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,978	Originally posted by lastdodobird Does increasing the EV help with high iso shots? I did these test shots a few hours ago (DA40/2.8 + K100D @ ISO3200, f5.6) with +0.7EV and they seem to come out better... All I can say is "WOW"

09-02-2009, 07:16 PM	#169
systemA Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: New York, NY Posts: 385	Originally posted by lastdodobird Taken with a K100D + DA40/2.8 ISO3200, f5.6 Knew I saw this somewhere! Greets from head-fi

09-08-2009, 09:43 AM	#170
planedriver Inactive Account Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Velence, Hungary Posts: 664	K200D DA16-45 16mm, f4, iso 1250, 1/15, -1EV, no PP K200D DA16-45 16mm, f4, iso 1600, 1/5, no PP K200D F35-105 105mm, f5.6, iso 1600, 1/8, no PP Cheers Andras

09-08-2009, 11:59 AM	#173
Jewelltrail Veteran Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Rhode Island Photos: Albums Posts: 4,180 Original Poster	Quote: jgredline: These are straight from the K20D....no pp done aside from cropping and resizing. I shot these in black and white as Jpegs... All hand held Wow! Jarvier, which lens are you using here?

09-08-2009, 12:50 PM	#174
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628	Originally posted by Jewelltrail Wow! Jarvier, which lens are you using here? Thanks, while not the greatest of photos, I thought they where pretty ok. I was using my beloved Tamron 17-35f/2.8-4.0...What an amazing lens this is.

09-08-2009, 02:03 PM	#175
danielchtong Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Toronto Posts: 885	If you feel like counting facial hair or noise pixel go for the original of this lowly & cheapo DL iso 1600 shot done in 2006. Lens used was FA135mm . I had to use F6.7 to get both subjects in focus and I had to crank up iso to compensate for a no-flash situation. High resolution monitor is preferred for this image (my all time favorite demo for low noise sensor) IMGP8141.JPG photo - Daniel TONG photos at pbase.com Daniel

09-09-2009, 10:06 AM	#176
Jewelltrail Veteran Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: Rhode Island Photos: Albums Posts: 4,180 Original Poster	Quote: jgredline:Thanks, while not the greatest of photos, I thought they where pretty ok. I was using my beloved Tamron 17-35f/2.8-4.0...What an amazing lens this is. "pretty ok" ---pics at 3200 with clarity, contrast and sharpness like this="pretty ok"? r u serious? Yes, that lens is a winner. If I opt to sell my Tammy 17-50 and replace it with the 28-75, this lens would fill in admirably for the gap I would then have below 28mm. However, I do not see these 17-35s---anywhere. This LBA thing never rests, instead it always has my mind envisioning all possible permutations (affordable and not) of various lens collections. Quote: danielchtong: (my all time favorite demo for low noise sensor) Yes, it sure is. I heard this sensor is excellent with noise, but it is more convincing to see it here--thanks.

09-09-2009, 10:30 AM	#177
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628	I had the 17-50 Tamron version and it did not compare to the 17-35 in quality or focus speed.

09-09-2009, 10:31 AM	#178
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628	By the way. The rest of the series is here. Life on the train - jgredline's Photos Many at ISO 6400 and all the exif is intact.

09-09-2009, 09:32 PM	#180
wolfier Senior Member Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 123	Excellent pic as usual, pcarfan! Goes to show that in the right situation, there's a place for any ISO Originally posted by pcarfan Shot at iso 3200 and pushed 1.5 EV in PP for an iso 9600 (equivalent). Used noiseware pro and masking.

Pentax High ISO Gallery - post here

Win a Pentax Limited Lens: Raffle Now Live!