Originally posted by JohnBee I'd like to update this thread with a little input in hopes of helping someone along the way.
From my own experience, the KPS magnifier is well made and works as advertised.
However... do keep in mind that a magnifications over a viewfinder does affect the overall FOV also. The effect(unfortunately) will vary based on the distance between the eye and the actual viewfinder itself, however, it many cases, you will find yourself shifting your line of sight slightly in order to see the entire VF layout. One example of this is where you might want to look at the bottom information panel(realtime frame statistics: ISO, Shutter, Ev etc.) which would require that you shift your eye(slightly) so as to see the bottom.
Having said that, the KPS 1.3x magnifier works well, and having used them on my K20's, and the line of sight changes never really bothered me at all.
If I had one thing to complain about, that would be where the eyecup can and does loosen-up over time and can get lost. I've lost two of these in one summer until I finally giving-in and putting loc-tite on it.
PS. there is also the TENPA 1.36x Magnifier Eyepiece for PENTAX that I think is well deserving of a look. The item seems very well built and perhaps better than its KPS counterpart.
Hope this helps
Originally posted by DogLover I recently ordered the "new" Tenpa 1.36 and fell in love with it! So much so that I almost immediately ordered another one for my other body. This comes after years of using OME-53's. The Tenpa's mounting plate is specifically for Pentax (there are different models, obviously), so there are no adapter plates to use. The optics are first-rate and overall construction is very solid. The only negative in my book is that the rubber eyecup is a dust-hair-lint magnet, but it can be used without the cup, as there is another rubber-lined eyepiece. I think it's worth it to use the eyecup, though, as the light sealing is really nice. Highly recommended!
+1 on the Tenpa. it is one very useful tool and much better than the OME-53. I haven't really tried the KPS but from the looks of it, the Tenpa seems to be slightly better when it comes to built (especially the complaint that JB has about it). considering that the prices are not that too far from each other, my vote goes to the Tenpa. workmanship is great and really handy tool for intricate focusing. only minor complaint about it blocks the full corners of the VF (like a vignetting effect in your vision) but it is not really a bother unless you are focusing on the corner edges which I don't think that people would focus on.
btw, I highly advice people to get the 1.36x magnification inorder to get the full FOV of the image. anything higher than that would cut out your field of vision to the center of the image.
also, I have been using the Tenpa for almost 2 years now, and it has never gotten worn out.