Originally posted by Wheatfield Quite an amazing statement to make, considering that every single parameter other than high ISO performance is an improvement over the K20, and comparing the high ISO noise levels on both cameras is just trying to determine which one sucks more.
Well I do appreciate the polite way you phrased your statement :-)
To me its not so amazing and not so different from what many other folks have previously said. I'm not saying that there aren't improvements in the K7, there certainly are. But i don't intend to buy each new camera as it comes along.
I just went through a great experience for an amateur, having theatre photos published in 3 newspapers and great compliments for decorating the local theatre lobby with 16 photos. Several of those photos I selected from 3 other photographers which helped broaden my perspective. During low light scenes (flash prohibited), those photos that stood out from the 1100 i reviewed, were the ones that used 3200 or 4000 ISO to improve aperture/DOF or shutter speed to freeze action.
Many of you experienced photographers encourage new people to establish their equipment priorities for their type of photography. And thats what i've done. I've narrowed my priority down to just 3: high ISO, high ISO, high ISO :-) Everything else I need for my photography is doable with the K20.
The Kx has been very remarkable in bringing new owners to the Pentax brand. My conclusion on what's driving its popularity and its reviews is high ISO performance - at least for the experienced buyers.
Last edited by philbaum; 05-05-2010 at 08:43 AM.