Originally posted by Ray Somerfield This isn't something that should require a major investment of resources, only a simple firmware update. There are times when I would CHOOSE to use the in camera dark frame subtraction, but there are others where speed is a major issue, even if it results in a noisier image. Just a FEW examples where speed is important: Lightning, fireworks, airplanetrails, astronomy.
I still love pentax. I've been shooting film for years and already have a collection of lenses . I've only just recently got into DSLRs.. I currently have a K200d, I would of grabbed a k20d but I find the permanent DFS feature unbearable. My plan was to get used to the k200d and digital processing, then next year grab the K7, but I will likely skip it too now and wait for the k7 successor. If pentax announced a firmware fix, I would most likely go for the K7 as my upgrade.
What do you have against us raising our voices over this? Would you rather we all just jumped ship to canon/nikon and kept quiet? IF pentax was to notice this issue, it seems to best way to do it is to make a fuss over it while the camera is still new and is very likely to get several firmware updates. Do you seriously think it is that difficult to add a menu feature to toggle this option?
Exactly, right on! Thanks Ray!
This 'don't rock the boat' attitude among some Pentax...um... fanboys (with half-hearted apologies to NoStatic) is infuriating! The arguments given are nonsense and one rarely sees this attitude in the Canon forums. Why some Pentax owners so hostile? Is this a superiority complex?
When Canon screws up, I've seen Canon owners join together and scream 'bloody murder'. The differences appear to be that Canon owners stick together and Canon listens to their customer's needs... whether it is using the Camera for Astronomy, higher ISOs, etc. When I say Canon, I am also considering that Nikon is similar in their attitude toward their customers.
In stark contrast, virtually every issue posted by Pentax forum members was meant with some hostility. Examples: Banding problem on K20D (some members rudely suggested one shouldn't use the K20D in the cold!), My own DFS complaints, The K20D body grip complaints, AF issues with the K20D (some members were called Canon fanboys and/or trolls for daring to suggest that Canon's AF was better!), K20D ISO noise (another bit of blasphemy), and I could continue with examples....some are not so serious, some are.
There are all kinds in this forum.... but can we show a little more civility toward each member?
Again, my complaint isn't unreasonable in the least! I (we) are asking for basic functionality that should be expected on any DSLR!
So NoStatic (et al), with all due respect, you are incorrect this time.