Hi, folks,
As I like to
eat my own dog food, I've done a good bit of searching (which my employer can plainly see in the logs), trying to find specific commentary on my questions. I've found general discussion with comparisons, but not on ergonomics.
Yesterday, much to my delight, I found that Cord Camera in Cincinnati actually stocks Pentax. However, the only models they had were the K200D and the K2000. Based on what I've read in these forums, I was eager to try out a K20D, but, alas.
I held the K200D, and was immediately disenchanted with the body. My right hand fit fine, but there wasn't much room for my left hand. Maybe this is endemic to DSLRs, though my wife's D40 feels pretty decent in my average-sized hands. I was then handed a Sony A700, and was immediately impressed with the ergonomics.
I know that there are comparisons of IQ and features, and I've been browsing them. Having been told that the Sony alphas have Minolta lineage, and that some/all AF Minolta lenses (we have one on a Minolta film camera) are compatible, seems comforting somehow, too. I can make assessments on those dimensions via other threads.
But ergonomics aren't trivial, especially for you pros. Your camera is your tool, and if its form factor is a hindrance, that's a problem. I am barely a consumer, let alone a pro, but if I'm spending money, I'm fretting the ergonomics.
So, my question, in that context: how does the K20D compare to the K200D, as far as hand-held fit? I've read here that some consider it on the heavy side, which I'm not worried about. But when it feels, to my left hand, as if I'm holding a curved brick (how the K200D felt), well, that's not quite optimal.
If, in the bargain, I can get impressions of the price comparison between Sony lenses (purportedly quality Carl Zeiss stuff, but not inexpensive it seems) their and Pentax counterparts, that'd be great; but I can dig around for that.
Obliged.
Daniel