I disagree - being smaller is A LOT OF VALUE to some people. If you want larger, you can always buy a grip. There's nothing inherently ties being smaller than "consumer" and "beginner". I go from K10D to the K-7 - one of the reasons is it's smaller and lighter - if I needed large I would have jumped to a D700 instead.
Now I can fit more into my camera bag.
I wonder why back in the film days nobody complained about Pentax's small bodies (like the pro-spec LX) but in the digital age, somehow, the bigger=better mindset settles in.
I think the size of the K-7 is perfect. The *ist D was a bit too small, though - but of course there would be people with even smaller hands who found that perfect.
Also, smaller bodies also appeal more to female buyers, which can make up to 50% of the purchases if you market it well.
If you don't understand Pentax's motive to make a DSLR smaller, let me tell you this: Pentax has always been about small bodies, right back from the K, M and the MZ series. The K-7 is also here to answer the call people often have, that they want a true successor to the *ist D. I think it has arrived, in the form of K-7.
Originally posted by pentaxmz I completely agree with you about the size. I don't understand Pentax's motive for making a DSLR smaller. By nature, it is automatically a bulkier camera than a point and shoot! Making it slightly smaller adds absolutely NOTHING to its value.
Save the smaller form-factor for the consumer, beginner, and P&S models!
Have you considered the body grip? At least, IMHO, the new body grip is a huge improvement over the K20D's grip. I applaud Pentax's decision to allow for AA batteries in the grip!