Originally posted by robgo2 I remember very similar sentiments being expressed when the K20D was introduced. Many K10D users, myself included, did not feel that the K20D represented a large enough jump in features and IQ to justify upgrading. Now, some K20D users are having the same thoughts about the K-7. On the other hand, the K-7 is a sizable step up for owners of all other Pentax DSLRs, and I believe that group have the greatest potential for upgrading. I will certainly give it serious consideration myself.
Rob
I actually disagree about the K10d/K20d differences. I briefly had a K10d and was not impressed. I then pondered my options for a bit and was ready to get a D300 when the K20d came out. I checked it out (my local shop knows me well) and found that it was significantly better than the K10d (in my hands, the way I shoot). Both from performance and iq.
I think the K7 is a pretty good move for Pentax. It takes the best features of the K20d (eg iq, which is as good as anything else in class), adds new features, fixes some old niggles, and packs it into a more compact form factor that is far more rugged than the competition. It occupies a rather unique area.
For any current Pentax user, the K7 is an upgrade that is worth thinking about. The K20d is the only other model that has comparable iq, and the K7 improves in a number of other areas. Ergonomics are an individual thing, but thankfully Pentax actually gives you a choice:
Great performance, features, small form factor, tough/weather-proof? K7
Arguably a bit less performance in focus/metering, a few less features, larger form factor, great iq, tough/weather-proof? K20d
Good performance, tough/weatherproof? K200
Good performance, small form factor? K2000
They have identified their niche, and seem to be covering it well. And I just ordered a 16-50* lens today so evidently I'm not leaving the marquee any time soon...