Originally posted by brew I have a K20D on its way and only after a great deal of research, so it's good to know others also feel it's a good choice. I have always liked Pentax and have a K2 film SLR. I would have gone for the K7 but for the extra dollars, I don't think it would have given any better results. Can't wait to get it.
Congratulations to you and the OP and all who decided to get it. For the price its a steal. The IQ is good all the way to iso3200 and iso3200 is fine. I just took a bunch of iso3200 out in the dark under low light and they pics are fine with some PP and NR (shot raw). If you needed AF speed and tracking you would not be shooting Pentax would you? You would have switched long ago. So for most Pentax shooter the K20D is very high value.
Seeing how I just bought my K20 5 months ago, got the free 3 years of warranty, got a great deal $630 for the body, $120 for the battery grip and got a free Pentax sling bag and Magic lantern guide. This is my second dSLR in one year. Its time I get my monies worth, keep it, improve my photography skills with it (this is a semi-pro dSLR, and well beyond me) get some nice glass. And see what next year and the K-8 brings to the table. The K-7 is a fine camera but I don't need video, more AF speed, the K20D is very accurate. Or a metal body, glass reinforced polycarbonate is as strong as steel but can flex without breaking. the K-7 is tougher because it can withstand more cold. But really each body has its own benefits. The K20D is still the low iso 100-400 detail champ officially as far as pro reviews. Until the K-7 gets reviewed and we see if it has more detail, same or less. And as a heavy cropper and landscape shooter this is most important to me.