Originally posted by Bunny Gear It's funny to read some comments. Pentax AF system is far behind Nikon with moving objects and reportage.
K-7 has good level AF and it's real evolution of SAFOX, but it's still SAFOX VIII.
Dear Pentaxians, it's maybe sound unbelievable for your ears, but it's FACT:
Nikon D3, D3X, D300, D700 can really offer 100% results with AF-C with moving object without fall of speed.
Remark - not in 100% cases of shooting. Sometimes you can get only 30 or 50% sharp shots.
BUT. This camera really has AF-C speed as you can read it in specification and you really can get 100% sharp photos in this condition or another.
K-7's AF-C speed with moving object is not the best among semi-pro APS-C DSLR.
As for K10D or K20D, this cameras are 50% worse than K-7 in AF-C.
You're right that those cameras you listed above have better AF-C performance.
But if we picked two low-cost cameras, of course the D300 has better AF-C accuracy than the K20D, and recent reviews have proven that. But what you don't point out is that you're not doing an apple-to-apple comparison - the D300 body is 1.5x the cost of the K20D (using local price list), and that's not even including a lens or any image stabilisation with the D300. The additional cost of a stabilised kit to cover 18mm-200mm is 5x more for the D300 than the additional cost for the K20D.
Now picking two high-cost cameras that you mentioned (at least as high as Pentax goes), of course the D3X will have better AF-C than the K7. But what do you expect with a camera that costs over 8x more than the other? I mean are you serious?
Go to a Toyota forum and complain about the car not being as fast as a Ferrari that costs 8x as much, and i think it would be equally funny to see the comments you get back.