Originally posted by Samsungian Ricehigh is most likely one of the few who:
Owns a F* 300mm f4. FA* 24mm f2, FA* 85mm 1.4 , a green Km which you may want to correct me is listed as current and not "several generations old" dslr ???
Heres a post when he compared colors of Pentax Lens finishes to his ugly green and orange highlight plastic Km:
Green Plastic, White Plastic is just Pentax Marketing Silliness to me.
I've read pentax damaged one of his limited edition dslrs years ago and failed to make it right or even do a thing about it to rectify the damage.
One thing I'll agree with is why Ricehigh stays with pentax? I know why I do as I have an assortment of old K Mount glass that works rather nice with K20D and since I paid half off on it new it was worth a try before I cashed out of K Mount lenses. Turned out I liked K20D so I'll stay for now. Having a K20D doesn't make me want to buy any new lenses as I have far less faith in first generation SDM motors duribility and initial quality control: Example 16-50mm 2.8 SDM. Thesedays Pentax lenses I still consider are old KA and FA that are made in Japan optics. Most have lasted a decade or longer so I have much faith in the old and super well made with aperture ring at mount Pentax lenses. I tried 3 FA and KA and passed on them yesterday locally, instead buying another nice used nikon lens instead.
Another point, the "quality control" or lack of QC on K-7 means I'll never buy one, even at half of pentax typical inflated launch price in April 2010. So at the moment Pentax is a dead end system to me and my wife who I primarily buy gear for.
I still enjoy the Pentax gear I have but I am mindful of where the exits are.
RH doesn't own the FA* 24/2 AL [IF], and from my understanding never has. There is no lens called the F* 300mm f4. There is a F* 300/4.5 ED [IF], but not the faster version like DA* 300/4 ED [IF] SDM. Besides the F* 300mm f4, according to FotoMagazin tests, it is still not up to the superb FA* 300/2.8 ED [IF].
The general notion has been that RH owned one lens that was worth crawing; the FA* 85/1.4, (though that one is still not as good as the A* 85/1.4)
RH's collecting of Pentax glass fades, compared to many of the usual users at DPr.
(His two last pictures are both with the 85 mounted, just without lens hood. This might have been what mislead you.)
Does he own the olive K-m, or did he just take some pictures, with lenses mounted ?
He was atleast wrong, in his calculations regarding it. Therefore my question, if he really owns the K-m.
I didn't mean to re-surface the discussion, so sorry for bringing up the thread again, after it had sung some pages down. Just felt like giving my chip-in, why I seldom wanna waste time participating in RH discussions. Even if the OP wanted to force one.
I've never before heard, how RH should have owned a limited edition DSLR. Very few were ever made from Pentax. Nor have I heard that Pentax should have failed to make it right or rectify damage. I know that he was mumbling about wanting to sue Pentax, before he was kicking out of DPr.
I don't have a problem that he doesn't like Pentax. But I just find it illigitimate to be masquerading as a Pentaxian to give personal advice to coming DSLR users, and then trying to persuade them to stay away from Pentax. I’ve seen this happening in threads here or other places.
Personally, if I wanted advice from a Nikon user, I wanted him to play with open cards, and not secretly being e.g. a Sony user, trying to sway me over.
Last edited by Blue; 10-10-2012 at 07:38 PM.