Originally posted by pingflood Sure, but those guys weren't shooting rally cars, birds in flight, home interiors and so forth and so on.
Different times, different needs, different gear.
But yes, I do agree that too many people obsess over the gear and expect it to be a replacement for hard work and talent. That doesn't make the gear irrelevant. Unfortunately a lot of people tend to see things as black or white, and it's either "the gear doesn't matter at all" or "the gear makes the photo". Reality is a little more nuanced.
I never meant to say that gear was irrelevant. Obviously a camera with better low light performance would be chosen for someone who shoot primarily concerts. I bought my K200d because at the time it had the best feature set for my price range and shooting style. I did a lot of research on all of the "Gear" out there before making my decision.
As far as different times different gear. I think that you are correct. However the gear only makes it easier to get the shot. There were plenty of birds in flight, Automobile racing, and building interior photographs taken before the advent of auto-focus. And many of those images are quite good.
I'm just saying that I think that often times there is an overemphasis on the gear at the expense of honing ones own craft.