Originally posted by philbaum Pepe,
Between your car shots, and the current thread from WalterGA on the national diving meet with a K20/Sigma combo, I would say all that moaning about the Pentax AF is not very relevant any more.
Congratulations on your images - fantastic!!
Phil (diving for cover :-))
I was doing a lot of "fooling around" photographing that diving meet, as that was the first occasion where I'd used the new Sigma with the K20D for any kind of action photography. I took a few shortcuts, as I wasn't trying to capture pics for the cover of S.I., but just kind of acclimating myself to the camera and lens.
I'd let the camera use AF and focus on the tip of the diving board, then quickly switch to MF before using the "Hi" continuous feature. Continuous shooting seems to work a lot smoother and faster for me when the camera's not having to focus. I was using high-enough f-stops so I knew I'd have a pretty long depth-of-field. Some of the shots, in hindsight, would have been better, had I opened up the aperture and blurred the background.
The fly-in-the-ointment for me, in deciding to go with the K20D, as opposed to the 50D that I'd been lusting after, was the low f.p.s. on the K20D. However, that was a tradeoff I was willing to make, in that I got the K20D for $629.
I like the Pentax controls and menu choices over the Canon...maybe because I've been shooting with an istDs2 for four years now. Also like being able to get cheap memory cards and to use the same cards that I've been using.