Originally posted by Slugger Actually I'm not surprised about the heat issue. A camera with extensive sealing is bound to heat up.
I would not say that should be true as the frame and Mg-Alloy body will and likely does function as a heat sink. And even so, there are published operating ranges for the camera without any qualifiers. The K10/20D bodies are plastic (will not function as a heat sink like Mg-Alloy) and other than the firmware and LARGER body are pretty much the same inside as well as sealed. The heat sink ability of the body for the K7 should be more than enough to make up for the size/volume difference to allow heat dissipation.
If it is not fair to be critical of HoyaTax then the opposite has to apply as well, no apologies to dismiss a poor design or bad component...no excuses.
EDIT: I thought I should come back and add something. If my comments sound overly negative, truly I do not intend them that way. I am just being direct and am really happy with my K20D. But I think I am simply disappointed in the K7's issues which came along at the same time lense prices increased as well as finding out about the whole Hoya thing. I honestly was unaware of the "merger" and had I known I might not have made my switch because I am completely repulsed by Hoya's MAP agreements retailers are required to sign. For those who do not know MAP = Minimum Advertised Price and in many states in the US as well as countries around the globe such things are either already not legal or are in process of being made illegal. So I am frustrated that if Hoya insists on this business model, well, a lot of the fun of a great camera at reasonable prices is gone for me.
In the mean time like I wrote, I really love my K20D and am just feeling let down by the K7 which was the reason I decided to switch along with the pre-increase lense prices. Then top it off with the possible MAP issue.