Originally posted by Ash I wouldn't have Photoshop and Camera Raw if it wasn't for my graphic designer wife. Without them, I also wouldn't be able to shoot in RAW since Apple are a little slow getting on the iPhoto RAW file bandwagon for Pentax. They were really quick with the Canon and Nikon dSLRs - it's disheartening.
I wonder if that's a reflection on how they view the photographer market.
If I understand it correctly, Apple made the decision to include its Raw converters in the operating system, rather than providing them as add-ins for their applications. I imagine they see some advantage in doing things this way - but it means that they have to prep and issue an OS update in order to support new cameras.
I continue to disagree with the insinuation that Photoshop is somehow an indispensable tool. If you need something like PHotoshop, well, there's nothing else like Photoshop, really, so you need PHotoshop. But not everybody needs something like Photoshop. I seem to be getting along quite nicely without it. I have Essentials 5. I just don't crank it up, um, ever any more. For my own purposes, anyway, Lightroom + Picasa provide just about everything I need. I do occasionally get the urge to copy a pair of open eyes from one shot and paste them into another shot. But the urge passes. I spend far too much time in front of my computer as it is. I'm happier processing images fairly quickly in Lightroom and getting out with the camera again.
Will