Originally posted by Marc Sabatella Which statistics do you have that support this? Virtually every report I saw showed it underperforming expectations pretty significantly; one of Pentax's most disappointing DSLR's in that respect, in fact.
I'm not sure how big, but on Flickr the K200D does very well for a Pentax, coming in very close to the K20D.
The problem between the K10d/K100 series is that they were good enough to span 2 generations of first time DSLR buyers. You here that here all the time: "Should I upgrade my K10?"
The K2xxx series stalled because of timing, not technically. They both got very good overall reviews, if the AF system was maligned. Sadly, the later probably had something to do with keeping Pentax on the fringe as opposed to mainstream.
The K-M/2000, even accounting for being on the market less than one year, does terribly. I suspect ho-hum to poor reviews eclipsed its price point and convinced people to fork over another $100 on another brand, or stick with the big guys. That's always the low-end problem: cut corners to get the lowball ranking, get hammered by the guy who is a marginal cost above you, just.
Flickr's camera finder is a phenomenal database for tracking after-market usage as the data set is very, very large.
I am impressed by the Optio line and its presence on Flickr. The distinction (until recently) between Pentax and Canon, Fuji, etc. based on durability and WR, served them very well. It says that lots of people shop on that spec. A good decade into digital media enough people have had enough of flimsy products. Photos are precious, so the camera is thought to be as well. Look how people carry them.
Now that Pentax makes every Optio model 720p HD compatible, they're clearly focussed on being on the curve or slightly ahead f it. Something to build on, if they cold improve the sensor (Buy from Fuji, seeing as how they've become mercenary in their sourcing?).