Originally posted by smcclelland Frankly from a newcomer standpoint I don't really see where the disappointment in the K100D comes from or why you feel the need to have such "professional equipment" right away.
He wasnt saying that he was disappointed with the k100d, he was saying that most of his decision is based on the lack of decent pentax glass where he lives. And im in the same situation. Why make a commitment on a camera system when there is only a handful of decent lenses available close by.
Lets look at it this way, say im shooting canon. I can walk into any of the big name camera stores near me (and the smaller ones too), hand over the cash for a canon 70-200 f2.8L IS and take it home that day. For pentax, i would either be getting the sigma 70-200 f2.8 HSM or the DA* 50-150 f2.8 SDM, neither of which are available or have a definite release date, so i would be handing over the cash to be put on a waiting list.
Say im not after that lens in particular. Most of the camera shops do carry the usual 16-45, 50-200 and maybe the 10-17. but if im after anything else, fat chance. Id even be waiting for a 3rd party lens for pentax to be ordered in by the camera shop. So that would be a couple of days wait at least.
In short, C&N (and even olympus now) have a better range of glass that is readily available to the public. Until pentax can at least come close to that, they are going to miss out on a lot of customers and even lose some in the process.
Originally posted by ChrisA I
And is an FA* lens at 4.1 MP going to give better results than an FA lens at 10 MP? Really?
Like he has said, the MP doesnt bother him. Heck there are tons of people going from 20d/30d and XTi's to a 1d classic because it is an upgrade. Yes more detail can be captured with a higher MP count, but think of what else the camera has going for it.
Throw any L series lens on a 1d classic, and you are going to get amazing performance, once you know how to handle it.