Originally posted by Buschmaster Currently I'm shooting a Pentax K110D so any of the current bodies will feel like a giant upgrade, and I'll likely sell the K110D to a friend along with a lens (Maybe the kit lens and pick up the 16-50?)
... It seems to me that the K-x may handle high ISO better which to me would be a GIANT plus.
Personally I would be upgrading from the kit lens before being too worried about high ISO.
Although the K-x has some pretty impressive ISO capabilities, I would go for the K20D. It's a robust camera, and was a 'flagship' DSLR for Pentax for many reasons. The frames per second etc may be slightly lower, but it's a real higher-end DSLR with more features, and provides for more user-ability than the K-x
seems t do, based on what I've read.
I agree with the other posters, K20D's can be had for a real bargain price, and spend any other available dollar on glass. A K20D/K-x with a kit lens might not provide the kind of improvement over a K110D with a kit lens you've been hoping for.