Good evening to all!
It has been quite a while since I posted here - only to discover that the site now requires a donation for using the sell feautures of the MarketPlace - but that's ok, this site is well worth it.
So ...
I have had my "eyes" on the K7 ever since it came available here. I even went to try it out at the local store, equipped with my two DA* lenses (10-50 and 300 F4). I was amazed at the FPS and its quietness. The pics came out very good, given that they were all taken either in the store and/or through the store's large windows! I haven't tried it out on the other lenses though.
Anyway, now I am reading all sorts of comments on how bad the high ISO pictures come out with the K7. Apparently, the K-x does better in spite of its "starter's" camera status.
I own both the K10D and the K20D ... why did I want the K7? ...
Fast FPS, better AF, quieter, in a nutshell: needed for wildlife photography. (which I do 90% of the time). Are those reasons good enough for me in deciding to get the K7?
I am not so sure anymore.
If I only knew that a "hybrid" K7 - K20D - Kx would come out, then I would be willing to wait but that is unlikely, knowing Pentax.
Finally, in order to finance the K7, I was getting ready to put some items on sale here; I will probably do it as soon as I make up my mind with the help of those reviews (here on this site) from users of the K7 and possible comments to my thread.
So, Have all a good evening and I look forward to reading some comments/replies/opinions, and the like.
Cheers!
JP