Originally posted by asinla Hi, this is my first post here so I would like to thank all the other posters for the great info and discussions.
I ordered my K-x on Friday last week. Tonight I saw an ad for the Nikon D5000 so I went online and checked it out. Looks pretty cool I must say, especially that swiveling screen. I had a small twinge of buyers remorse.
I chose Pentax mainly because the only manual camera I have ever owned is my still trusty P30n. I also have 2 great lenses that I will be able to use with the K-x. I also liked the specs and reviews on the K-x.
Both cameras have what I am looking for but I am wondering whether the D5000 would have been a better entry level DSLR.
Anyone have any thoughts on the matter?
Thanks
.
The three main advantages of the D5000 over the K-X are 1) the ability to buy and use the wonderful $199 35mm f/1.8G on the D5000, and 2) a better flash system for Nikon, and 3) slightly faster AF-lock, especially in low-light.
In every other significant way, the K-X matches or beats the Nikon.
That 35 1.8G has made a difference, IMO - it's a great lens and with the D5000, makes a killer low-light combo. Pentax has the FA 35 f/2, but it's been discontinued and is now around $400. The DA 35ltd is incredible, but slower and around $500. Nikon also has the 50 1.8G for $109 new.
I have not shot the K-X, but I've compared the D5000 to the K-7 in store twice, and with the kit lenses at least, the D5000 locked focus slightly faster. I'm assuming the K-X would be the same.
But really, aside from those things, you got the better camera in the K-X.
.