Originally posted by cb750r I've only had my KM for half a year, and I'm starting to outgrow it, I really like the small pakage size and taking it mtn biking and hiking and skiing. I'm not impressed with the noise levels at 800, and would like a faster frames per second.
Do I get enough of an upgrade going to a KX?
is a K20d used the best bang for the buck?
or go for it and get a K7?
forsake the Pentax clan and save my pennies for a 7D?
In my opinion it all depends on what things/features limit you exactly? When you say "starting to outgrow it", what are the 3-4 key things that limit you and want to be better in the next camera?
My advice: think about what really limits you, what are the things you really miss and write those down in a list. Then check for each item on your list which camera can deliver that feature and how much it costs. At the end you'll have something like this:
- faster AF -> K-7 slightly faster -> ~ $1000 -> worth spending $1000 to get slightly faster AF yes/no?
- higher FPS rate -> K-x / K-7 -> ~ $500 / $1000 -> worth spending $500 / $1000 for higher FPS rate yes/no?
- ......
At the end you'll see which cam can give you most of what you need, how much of an improvement it could give and does that improvement worth the price of the new cam.
Only you can decide what are the thing you miss, how much you miss them (or really miss them at all) and how much you willing to pay for slight/moderate/big improvements.
Btw K20D has slower AF, lesser FPS rate (although bigger buffer), consider these before you "upgrade" to that.