Originally posted by PentaxPoke [Sigh] Go back to post #11 and repeat. After that go back to post#4 and answer my question. Which was the k-x and which was the D5000? What is the point of me posting replies to you if you are not going to look at them?
i think we are not moving anywhere, you just as adamant as me on not listening to what i am saying. To put it shortly these are my points:
1. Noise is more problem in darker areas than brighter areas. So picked a darker area portion for comparison, which clearly does not put d700 on 2stops better light.
2. when you say d700 is two stops better, i shall be able to see it on full image and not on the parts of it. In other words if i pick any part of any image that advantage shall not be lost.
you can show me some parts where d700 might be better but it is not for complete image.
3. you were saying about noise and details, the crop i posted noise of d700 was worse plus i do not see much more detail as you said.
Originally posted by PentaxPoke Jees...the k-x is a great camera. What is the point of continuing to compare it to other cameras? Just be happy with it, and stop worrying about how it compares to Canon and Nikon.
d700 is also nice camera but it is not what you were making out to be. I am not worrying , only thing is i do not agree with your assessment.