Originally posted by nulla Sorry BBear, but I cannot see the K-x being classed as an upgrade from the K20 or the K-7 and by what I have tried and tested it has good ISO performance .but its no replacement.
Hi Neil,
first of all, there is no need to be sorry, even if we had different opinions, which may not be the case actually in this issue.
I did say that IF he feels the K20D's ISO is limiting (for his style) AND the body is TOO BIG, then the Kx WILL improve on that.
Obviously if the OP feels 1600 for instance is more than enough OR that the K20D has a nice grip and handling or even that WR is essential, then there is not much to ask here, is there?
Like I tried to point out, it boils down to necessity. And dont get me wrong, I still have the K10D, but I dont use it half as much I thought i would... so yeah, I could
almost say the Kx REPLACES it... but then we are talking about K10D x Kx... and that was a "almost" and not "fully".
And regarding the K7, it is important to point out that K7 body is more compact than K20D, so even LESS reasons to consider the Kx, if size was a concern.