Pentax K100D or K100D Super?
Oh dear.......the more information one reads in these forums, the greater the difficulty in deciding becomes ! I am in a terrible quandry as to which direction to proceed next. Many years ago I started out with a pair of Olympus OM1 bodies accompanied by a few lenses, because I firmly believed that at the time, their cameras were the toughest and lightest 35mm film cameras available. I later acquired a Mamiya medium-format body paired with their superb Sekor 50mm f4.0 shift lens, mainly for shooting architectural photography. I was quite happy with matters until the dreaded subject of 'digital' photography tentatively raised it's head above the proverbial parapet in the early 1990's.
In the near future I would dearly love an opportunity to actually use this magnificent shift lens on a digital camera body equipped with a genuine full-frame 6 x 4.5 sensor (No crop-factor please. Is anyone still listening at Mamiya ?) I believe that most sane individuals nowadays regard the asking price for medium-format digital backs/bodies as utterly excessive. I am categorically not a professional myself and have no intention whatsoever of throwing stupid amounts of money at equipment that can so rapidly become obsolete.
Going from one extreme to another, I first dipped my toe in the digital waters and bought a Fuji Finepix F602Z digital bridge-camera with dust-free-sensor, which has served me fairly well for quite a few years. In some ways the easy upgrade path from the F602Z might have been to purchase a Fuji S9500, but I became deeply concerned by the number of people who have reportedly experienced severe problems with broken or malfunctioning command-dials on this model, allied to debatable image quality & noise issues ? The ideal choice ought to have been the Fuji S9600, but for some unfathomable reason the manufacturers messed around with it's hand-grip, which is tangibly narrower (far less comfortable to me) than the S9500. Why in god's name can't camera designers leave perfectly adequate designs alone for more more than 5 minutes ! In a moment of madness I supplemented the S602Z with a Panasonic FZ20, which is endowed with a fantastic stabilised Leica 36-420 zoom lens. However the downside of this design is a truly noisy sensor ! Oh lordy, where do I go from here ? You've probably guessed by now that I've been desperately trying to resist the continuous onslaught of the 35mm digital SLR bandwagon, whilst waiting for prices to become more realistic.....so maybe that day is at last approaching ? I reckon that handling-wise, the nearest digital equivalent to my old Olympus OMI is perhaps the K100D with SR (Shake Reduction), which instinctively feels ergonomically right to me. Incidentally, I've briefly handled Nikon's D40/40X and Canon's 400D bodies, but both of their hand-grips feel way too small for my liking and their respective range of VR and IS stabilised lenses seem excessively expensive in comparison to Pentax lenses. Another advantage of the K100D is that it can use AA rechargeable NiMH batteries (of which I have many). I can never fully comprehend why many people seem to dislike them so much, as proprietary batteries often become obsolete over a relatively short period ?
I'm aware that the K100D isn't equipped with inbuilt Dust Removal (DR) or an SDM (Sonic Direct-drive Motor) pin, but the recently announced K100D Super DSLR addresses the DR and SDM issues. I am particularly underwhelmed by the fact that this new camera only features a 6 megapixel sensor, but wholly appreciate that under certain low ambient light conditions the 6 MP sensor in the K100D behaves less 'noisily' than the 10MP one in the K10D. Nevertheless the benchmark has been raised by the closest competition and I would personally expect nothing less than 10MP on a supposedly *new SLR camera (how about a Pentax K100D SG (for *Stop-Gap !). I quite often selectively crop my images and for this reason alone would find a 10MP sensor to be invaluable. If and when Pentax eventually get around to producing a full-frame digital SLR (dream on !) with a 36mm x 24mm sensor , I imagine that all those APS-C specific lenses will suddenly drop like a stone in value, but maybe this is the unavoidable price we pay for progress ? I find the apparent shortage of Pentax's advertised range of lenses rather worrying and the overall situation is not exactly helped by the current uncertainty surrounding Hoya's recent take-over of the company. Although I greatly admire many aspects of the top-of-the-range K10D, I find it too bulky and unwieldy for my requirements, as I've become tired of carrying too much equipment around on holidays etc. Fortunately (or not, depending on your viewpoint) I don't possess any legacy K-mount glass. Even allowing for the focal-length magnification factor, I still remain unsure why so many of the old K lenses are apparently praised by some and yet seemingly dismissed by others as being unsuitable, because they are not 'digitally optimised' in the way the latest ones are ? In conclusion any constructive suggestions would be greatly appreciated as to which way I should proceed.
|