Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-28-2010, 08:06 AM   #1
Veteran Member
rustynail925's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philippines
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,551
Whats your lowest handheld shutterspeed

Whats your lowest handheld shutterspeed w/ blur free shots?
whats the percentage accuracy?
@ what focal length, and lens?

02-28-2010, 12:20 PM   #2
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2006
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 5,697
I can't really answer that question, however when I'm panning after a bird or something along those lines I often have longer shutter speeds deliberatly. As long as I do everything right what I want looks sharp.

If I'm using longer, hand held shots, and I want everything to look sharp I use the 2 second timer. From what I've seen most of the camera movement comes from pushing the shutter button, with most people... and the timer eliminates that.
02-28-2010, 12:31 PM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Photos: Albums
Posts: 410
QuoteOriginally posted by rustynail925 Quote
Whats your lowest handheld shutterspeed w/ blur free shots?
whats the percentage accuracy?
@ what focal length, and lens?
I have successfully gone down to 1\2 sec with SR on on my former K10D. Lens used was FA31... This is more like an exception however.

Typically i can go down to about 1\15 and I usually get away with 50% blur free shots, with any of my lenses.
02-28-2010, 12:41 PM   #4
Veteran Member
Gaelen's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 749
I think it depends more of what you're shooting....

It's it static, then it might be easier, if it's in motion it's a bit different

02-28-2010, 12:41 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Mike Cash's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Japan
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,950
1/6 on a 135mm lens; thank you Pentax SR.

02-28-2010, 04:02 PM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ste-Anne des Plaines, Qc., Canada
Posts: 2,013
Sometime, I can get sharp pictures at 1/4 sec. Unfortunately, not often enough.
02-28-2010, 04:09 PM   #7
Veteran Member
nulla's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 1,560
depends on the lens as well

02-28-2010, 04:09 PM   #8
Senior Member
Alex00's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 294
For the average user, the rule of thumb is shutter speed should be double your focal lens. So if you're shooting at 50mm then set your shutter speed to 1/100 or a little bit faster if you have bad hand shake. Personally i can sometimes get away with 1/5 if i lean to a wall.
02-28-2010, 04:47 PM   #9
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT / NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 822
QuoteOriginally posted by Alex00 Quote
For the average user, the rule of thumb is shutter speed should be double your focal lens. So if you're shooting at 50mm then set your shutter speed to 1/100 or a little bit faster if you have bad hand shake. Personally i can sometimes get away with 1/5 if i lean to a wall.

OMG! This is funny... I always had, though I can't recall the origin of it, the conviction the rule of thumb as 1/FC and not 1/ 2x FC! I was so sure about it, that i might even ask if you are sure about doubling the focal distance...

I've always followed that in order to setup the camera, and then moved down, using the SR. That means I was already off by 1-stop on my calcs on my starting point...
02-28-2010, 07:35 PM   #10
Veteran Member
rustynail925's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philippines
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,551
Original Poster
I can manage to get 1/6 below 50% blur free shots using DAL 50-200mm @ 200mm
however using the FA 35mm my chances are low. At 1/10 shutterspeed i got below 40% blur free shots.. I tried shooting about more than 300 clicks still i cant get it right
02-28-2010, 10:12 PM   #11
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,079
This was 1/4s with an MX. Can't say I do i t a lot but I have got a few.



Swift1
02-28-2010, 10:33 PM   #12
Veteran Member
icywarm's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,278
This is why I could never be a professional photog. I am willing to risk 1/10 or slower sometimes if I need the DOF and if I miss the shot I don't really mind. I would hate to miss 'the Kiss' or something equally important. If I get one more photo to add to my yearly album I am happy.
03-01-2010, 12:20 AM   #13
Senior Member
Alex00's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 294
QuoteOriginally posted by BBear Quote
OMG! This is funny... I always had, though I can't recall the origin of it, the conviction the rule of thumb as 1/FC and not 1/ 2x FC! I was so sure about it, that i might even ask if you are sure about doubling the focal distance...

I've always followed that in order to setup the camera, and then moved down, using the SR. That means I was already off by 1-stop on my calcs on my starting point...
1/FC is not enough for most users and will still result in slight blur if you Pixel peep.
1/2xFC is the way to go for the average user and will keep you on the safe side. You can always go slower and change the numbers if you feel your hands are stable enough. Using a 50mm focal, 1/50 is still not fast enough for allot of users specially if the object is moving.
03-01-2010, 12:34 AM   #14
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Miguel's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Seattle
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,743
Good thread, I've always wondered what others can swing (or not).

With a K20D @ 35mm, SR activated, 1/15 about 35% of the time; 1/30 for normal stuff works well enough.

@ >125mm, SR activated, 1/45 about 50% of the time; 1/60 works well for static subjects.

With flash shooting people, 1/45 is OK enough; 1/60 better.

For my needs, it's about printed images or digital files that someone else downstream will do something with. For downsized web postings one can get by with slower shutter speeds.

M
03-01-2010, 03:48 AM   #15
Ash
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,920
Good examples shown here.
SR does work and saves many hand-held situations.
My strike rate's been good up to 1/5 sec. for a 35mm capture, but not so good for 50mm.
The sweet spot for me at 50mm with SR is about 1/15 sec.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, dslr, photography

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Webcams: sometimes the lowest quality cameras can take the best pictures Cannikin Photographic Technique 2 10-27-2010 05:00 AM
K-7 Lowest price I have seen. Uncle_dad Pentax DSLR Discussion 4 05-07-2010 06:59 AM
Shooting at Lowest Contrast? PNTXFTW12 Video Recording and Processing 2 02-21-2010 06:41 PM
Help plz. widest pentax lens with lowest distortion? kiamon Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 14 06-02-2008 05:41 PM
Pentax K20D Lowest Price maxamillion Pentax DSLR Discussion 11 03-05-2008 01:26 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:06 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top