[MrThallid]

not likely what the camera was designed for, but I did not want to take my Pentax Kx. I took 30 - 40 pictures. I hated maybe 3 and loved 9 enough to PP them... Below should be the original and the PP image scaled to 25% to save space.

Any fault you find in the photos is likely my inexperience with the camera and not a fault of the camera. I opened it Saturday morning with just enough time to charge the battery before heading out. Having said that, C&C quite welcome on both technique, composition, and PP'ing.

Attached Images

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

View Picture EXIF

File Date

 

[southlander]

For a tiny sensor, I'd say they came out very well.

[LowVoltage]

Pretty darn good results for ISO 1000 from a P&S. As you said, you did some post processing, but from the look of things the Pentax handled rather complex lighting if the last image is anything to go by.

[treebeard]

The last one is awesome.

[VisualDarkness]

I must say that I'm impressed as the reputation of waterproof cameras and image quality is quite brutal.

[MrThallid]

Same photos, added the post process, but also full size original JPG straight from camera for comparison.
www[DOT]flickr[DOT]com[bSLASH]photos[bSLASH]mrthallid[bSLASH]sets[bSLASH]72157633201862242

[MrThallid]

For a tiny sensor, I'd say they came out very well.

thank you

[MrThallid]

The last one is awesome.

Thank you