Originally posted by v3t0 no..i will encourage you guys to turn off SR for video recording..here are some of the reason why:
1. SR on will make some anoying noise(using internal mic) when you move your camera
I use an external microphone which is acoustically isolated from the camera. Most of the time, the stabilisation doesn't cause noises unless you move the camera quickly, which isn't likely to look much good anyway.
Quote: 2. whenever you move your camera while recording, the image will blur..we all know that we need to move the camera very frequently when recording video..the effect is same when you turn SR on while doing panning shot..
I'll have to do some more comparative tests on this. I'd expect to get blur when moving the camera anyway, and it's preferable to the ugly jerkiness which is visible of you disable stabilisation. The slight jerkiness when hand-holding a camera wasn't as noticeable in the days of standard definition video cameras, but with HD it becomes critical.
Quote: 3. SR will cause more jelly effect..you can see by trying to pan your camera from left to right(vice versea)..when you stop moving your camera, you will see that the video is still moving to the right/left due to the SR sensor shifting..
I shot some hand held video yesterday and using image stabilisation was definitely worthwhile. Sure, the best result will be with a tripod and not moving the camera at all, but it's not always possible to do this. With my 55-300 at about 200mm, image stabilisation helped a great deal. Without it, the hand held video was moved unacceptably. With the 16-45 at 16mm and f5.6, I was able to walk slowly with the camera while taking video. Obviously a steadicam would be ideal, but also very expensive.
As I said, I need to experiment more, but most of the time, image stabilisation is useful. For the best results, don't move the camera at all - set it up with a fixed shot on a solid tripod.