Originally posted by phosphoro So far Canon are leaders in vdslr and no other company even comes close (Panasonic Lumix is very competitive with 4/3 cameras). It's a bit of a headache because serious films and commercials are being shot with Canons for their low cost and high quality. I've worked with those cameras since I have access to them but privately I have primarily Nikon gear (in terms of quality lenses) and also a lot of Pentax stuff. Am still waiting for one or the other to bring on a competitive camera.
Look into the viewfinder of any Canon DSLR and tell me what you see when shooting a video. The Panasonic GH2 has better video quality than the Canon DSLRs.
Quote: Image quality is subjective. Some have valid reasons for liking the 5D Mark II and it's full frame sensor. Some will love the 60D's image. But Canon are now significantly behind Panasonic in terms of the overall video performance.
The Panasonic GH2 resolves significantly more detail with less noise than even the 5D Mark II at ISO 3200.
It's sensor is 3 years newer than the 5D Mark II's which accounts somewhat for the M43 sized sensor being able to catch up with full frame beast, coupled with poor image processor in video mode on the 5D Mark II.
http://www.eoshd.com/content/465-Canon-60D-versus-Panasonic-GH2-Full-Review-Part-2